ADVERTISEMENT
LIVE DESK·Global markets desk·Last updated 14s ago
ADVERTISEMENT
Novara — A Smarter Way to Access Global Markets
Markets/ForexArticle

U.S. Supreme Court backs Trump on mail-in voting restrictions

High court suspends preliminary injunction in 23 states and D.C., allowing federal directive to proceed while leaving nationwide postal service rules blocked.

SL
Sophie Laurent · FX & Rates Desk · 24 Aug 2026 · 23:32 · 1 min read
Share
U.S. Supreme Court backs Trump on mail-in voting restrictions

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday granted the Department of Justice’s emergency request to lift a preliminary injunction blocking President Donald Trump’s mail-in voting restrictions in 23 states and Washington, D.C. The 6-3 conservative majority ruling allows the administration to enforce a March 2026 executive order that restricts mail-in ballot access ahead of the November midterm elections.

The directive requires the Department of Homeland Security to compile and transmit state-by-state lists of eligible voters, directs the Department of Justice to prioritize prosecutions of election officials issuing ballots to ineligible voters, and mandates that the U.S. Postal Service deliver ballots only to voters on each state’s approved mail-in list. Federal Judge Indira Talwani in Boston had issued a preliminary injunction in June, ruling that the president lacks authority to alter state-administered federal elections and that federal agencies could not accurately compile voter eligibility lists.

Euro / US Dollar

EURUSD
Full profile →
1.1670▲ 0.05%
As of 24/08/2026, 21:00:00

The Supreme Court’s decision does not affect a separate August 11 injunction by Judge Talwani that blocks stricter mail-in voting rules imposed by the U.S. Postal Service nationwide. That ruling stems from a lawsuit brought by voter rights advocacy groups and remains in place. The high court’s order also does not address the merits of the underlying legal challenges, which are still pending in lower courts.

The Trump administration’s efforts align with legislative proposals such as the SAVE America Act, a stalled restrictive election package backed by the president in Congress. The midterm elections in November will determine control of Congress, heightening the stakes of voting access rules. The Supreme Court’s intervention follows a series of legal setbacks for the administration, including Talwani’s repeated rulings that federal overreach into state election processes exceeds executive authority.

This article was produced with AI assistance and edited by a Finance Review Daily journalist.
ADVERTISEMENT
Share this story
SL
Written by
Sophie Laurent
FX & Rates Desk

Sophie covers currency markets and central bank policy across Europe, with a focus on how rate decisions ripple through FX pairs. She has been tracking the ECB's policy path since the start of the current easing cycle.

More from Sophie Laurent →
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT