ADVERTISEMENT
LIVE DESK·Global markets desk·Last updated 14s ago
ADVERTISEMENT
Business/M&AArticle

Mining CEOs say regulatory hurdles won't block consolidation

Executives argue mergers remain viable despite stricter scrutiny on critical minerals, citing historical precedents and disciplined deal-making. Regulatory timelines stretch 12-18 months.

LF
Lucas Ferreira · Deals & Startups Desk · 20 Aug 2026 · 02:41 · 2 min read
Share
Mining CEOs say regulatory hurdles won't block consolidation

Mining industry leaders maintain that heightened regulatory scrutiny will not derail consolidation despite recent failed mega-deals, as executives emphasized disciplined approaches to mergers and acquisitions. Speaking after half-year results, CEOs from Glencore, Anglo American, and Rio Tinto highlighted the sector's ability to navigate complex approval processes amid growing government focus on critical minerals and supply security.

Regulatory timelines for major mining transactions now typically span 12 to 18 months, executives noted, reflecting increased scrutiny compared to five years ago. Gary Nagle, Glencore's CEO, acknowledged that regulators are paying closer attention to deals "given the geopolitics of the world and critical minerals," but stressed that transactions remain feasible if properly structured. "Of course, we're not going to go down a route of something that we don't believe is achievable or executable," Nagle said.

Duncan Wanblad, Anglo American's CEO, echoed this sentiment, stating that mining-related transactions are "probably a little bit longer" to complete than in the past but remain possible. "I have nothing to suggest at this point in time that mining-related transactions are impossible to get done or difficult to get done," he said. Peter Cunningham, Rio Tinto's CFO, emphasized the company's disciplined approach, noting the need to "think very, very deeply" about regulatory and other constraints before pursuing acquisitions.

The remarks follow a string of abandoned or failed mega-deals in the sector, where valuation disputes and strategic misalignments have posed greater obstacles than regulatory barriers. Anglo American's proposed $39 billion merger with Teck Resources, which would create a combined entity controlling roughly 5% of global copper production, remains pending approval from China—the final major jurisdiction yet to sign off. Analysts suggest Beijing may seek remedies focused on supply security or customer commitments rather than outright asset divestitures, given its substantial unused smelting capacity.

Historical precedent supports this approach. In 2013, Glencore's acquisition of Xstrata received Beijing's approval after structural and behavioral remedies, including the sale of the Las Bambas copper project in Peru and commitments to supply Chinese customers with copper, zinc, and lead. Meanwhile, Anglo American's ongoing sale of its nickel assets to China's MMG has triggered an in-depth European Commission investigation over concerns about potential supply diversion from European markets.

Industry executives argue that while regulatory hurdles have intensified, they are not insurmountable for well-structured deals that address geopolitical and supply chain concerns.

This article was produced with AI assistance and edited by a Finance Review Daily journalist.
ADVERTISEMENT
Share this story
LF
Written by
Lucas Ferreira
Deals & Startups Desk

Lucas covers M&A activity and startup funding rounds, tracking deal structures and valuations to explain what a transaction means for the companies and markets involved.

More from Lucas Ferreira →
ADVERTISEMENT
Novara — A Smarter Way to Access Global Markets
ADVERTISEMENT