FTEC, QQQ and KTEC among top tech ETFs for value investors
Comparison of three leading tech-focused ETFs highlights their expense ratios, sector exposure and performance metrics for cost-conscious investors.

Three technology exchange-traded funds—Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC), Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) and KraneShares CICC China Technology Index ETF (KTEC)—are among the most widely held by value-oriented investors seeking broad tech exposure at competitive costs.
FTEC tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index, providing diversified exposure to U.S. large-, mid- and small-cap tech stocks. With an expense ratio of 0.08%, it ranks among the lowest-cost tech ETFs, according to fund data. QQQ, one of the largest and most liquid tech ETFs, follows the Nasdaq-100 Index, which is heavily weighted toward mega-cap tech names such as Apple, Microsoft and Nvidia. Its expense ratio stands at 0.20%, higher than FTEC but still below the category average for large-cap tech funds.
KTEC offers a unique angle by focusing on Chinese technology companies, including Alibaba, Tencent and Meituan, through the CICC China Technology Index. The fund carries an expense ratio of 0.79%, reflecting higher costs associated with international exposure and smaller average market capitalizations. Despite its higher fees, KTEC has attracted interest from investors targeting growth opportunities in China’s tech sector amid recent policy shifts and market volatility.
Performance comparisons show that over the past five years, QQQ has delivered the strongest total returns, benefiting from its concentration in high-growth U.S. tech giants. FTEC has posted competitive returns with lower volatility, while KTEC has experienced greater swings due to its exposure to Chinese equities and regulatory risks. Expense ratios remain a key differentiator: FTEC’s 0.08% is the lowest among the three, followed by QQQ at 0.20% and KTEC at 0.79%.
For value investors prioritizing cost efficiency, FTEC’s low fees and broad U.S. tech exposure make it a compelling option. Those seeking liquidity and exposure to dominant U.S. tech leaders may prefer QQQ despite its higher expense ratio. Investors targeting international tech growth, particularly in China, may consider KTEC while accounting for its elevated costs and risk profile.
Priya covers listed equities and corporate earnings, reading quarterly results and guidance for what they signal about sector health and forward valuations.
More from Priya Anand →
